EduPort 2026, 10(2) | DOI: 10.21062/edp.2026.008

NÁRODNÍ WEBOVÝ PORTÁL PRO DŮKAZY O VZDĚLÁVACÍCH METODÁCH A STRATEGIÍCH: PROTOKOLY BUDOUCÍCH STUDIÍ

Jiří Kantor, Jana Černá, Jana Kořínková, Jitka Nábělková, Martin Jáč, Jitka Plischke, Tereza Vrbová, Eva Šmelová, Petra Šobáňová, Anna Boček Ronovská, Jaroslav Vala, Stanislav Štěpáník, Tomáš Hubálek, Zuzana Cieslarová, Jiří Dostál, Radka Dofková, Lenka Kružíková, Eva Dvořáková Kaněčková, Michaela Žišková, Vojtěch Regec, Michaela Hřivnová, Jitka Klugarová
Pedagogická fakulta Univerzity Palackého (Česká republika)

NATIONAL WEB-BASED PORTAL FOR EVIDENCE ON EDUCATIONAL METHODS AND STRATEGIES: PROTOCOLS OF FUTURE STUDIES


The development of evidence-based education has become an increasingly important priority within contemporary educational research, policy and practice. Whilst considerable progress has been made in generating research evidence on educational interventions, the effective implementation of evidence-based education requires substantially more than the production of research findings alone. Educational evidence must be systematically synthesised, critically appraised and translated into practice through effective knowledge translation processes. Only then can research evidence meaningfully inform teachers, school leaders, policymakers and other stakeholders. In countries with educational systems strongly oriented towards evidence-informed decision-making, these objectives are often supported through national evidence portals that provide accessible summaries and interpretations of educational research. Among the most influential examples is the Teaching and Learning Toolkit developed by the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) in the United Kingdom. The EEF Toolkit has become a widely recognised source of information regarding the effectiveness, implementation costs and strength of evidence associated with a broad range of educational methods and strategies. However, the direct transfer of findings generated within one educational system to another remains challenging because educational interventions are inherently shaped by national, curricular, institutional and sociocultural contexts. Consequently, educational evidence requires contextualisation before it can effectively support decision-making in different countries. These considerations have motivated efforts to develop a Czech adaptation of the EEF Toolkit and to establish a broader evidence infrastructure capable of serving the needs of the Czech educational community. This paper presents a protocol for a coordinated programme of research and development activities aimed at creating a national web-based portal providing evidence on educational methods and strategies. The portal will function as a publicly accessible resource synthesising current educational evidence whilst contextualising this information for educational practice and policy in the Czech Republic. It will build upon the structure and principles of the EEF Toolkit whilst extending its scope through the incorporation of additional sources of evidence, methodological innovations and mechanisms designed to address the specific needs of Czech users. The proposed programme is guided by four core principles: scientific rigour, contextual relevance, methodological transparency and accessibility for end users. To operationalise these principles, five interconnected studies have been designed. First, a nationwide cross-sectional analytical survey will examine the perceived relevance of educational methods and strategies included in the EEF Toolkit across educational levels, school types, subject areas and teacher characteristics within the Czech educational system. Secondly, subgroup analyses of studies included in the EEF Toolkit will be conducted to provide more precise information regarding the effectiveness of individual educational interventions across different populations, intervention characteristics and educational outcomes. Thirdly, a series of methodological reviews will identify, map and critically appraise existing systematic reviews in selected educational domains, including foreign language education, early childhood education, educational technologies, generative artificial intelligence and inquiry-based learning. Fourthly, new systematic reviews will be undertaken in areas where robust evidence syntheses are currently unavailable, particularly for educational approaches strongly represented within the Czech educational context, such as the Hejný method, reading instruction methodologies, differentiated instruction and other nationally relevant approaches. Fifthly, a qualitative study will investigate the needs of potential end users and evaluate the comprehensibility, usability and practical value of the portal’s content. Through semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, this study will explore how different stakeholder groups interpret educational evidence, identify their information needs and evaluate preferred modes of evidence communication that facilitate the practical application of research findings in educational settings. Methodologically, the programme combines quantitative, qualitative and evidence-synthesis approaches. Particular emphasis is placed on adherence to internationally recognised methodological standards, including PRISMA reporting guidelines, Joanna Briggs Institute methodologies, GRADE assessments of the certainty of evidence, and established procedures for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, methodological reviews and subgroup analyses. By integrating evidence synthesis, contextualisation and knowledge translation within a user-centred design, the programme seeks to address several limitations commonly associated with existing evidence portals, including insufficient adaptation to local educational contexts, incomplete coverage of educational methods and strategies, and limited responsiveness to end users’ needs. The anticipated outcome of this research programme is the establishment of a sustainable, transparent and methodologically rigorous national evidence portal capable of supporting evidence-informed educational decision-making in the Czech Republic. Beyond providing access to research findings, the portal is expected to facilitate communication among researchers, educational practitioners, school leaders and policymakers, thereby strengthening the broader culture of evidence use in education. By presenting transparent research protocols and predefined methodological procedures, this paper also contributes to the reproducibility, transparency and accountability of future studies. The proposed programme may serve as a model for the development of evidence-informed educational infrastructures in other national contexts. Furthermore, it may provide a foundation for future innovations, including interactive evidence-delivery systems and artificial-intelligence-assisted approaches to knowledge translation.

Keywords: evidence-based education, educational methods and strategies, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, evidence synthesis, Teaching and Learning Toolkit, EduArt Center, Schola Empirica z.s; knowledge translation; evidence-informed decision-making; national evidence portal.

Zveřejněno: 1. červen 2026  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kantor J, Černá J, Kořínková J, Nábělková J, Jáč M, Plischke J, et al.. NÁRODNÍ WEBOVÝ PORTÁL PRO DŮKAZY O VZDĚLÁVACÍCH METODÁCH A STRATEGIÍCH: PROTOKOLY BUDOUCÍCH STUDIÍ. EduPort. 2026;10(2):. doi: 10.21062/edp.2026.008.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Aromataris, E., Fernandez, R., Godfrey, C., Holly, C., Kahlil, H., & Tungpunkom, P. (2015). Summarizing systematic reviews: Methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 13(3), 132-140. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  2. Allen, K.-A., Reupert, A., & Oades, L. (Eds.). (2021). Building better schools with evidence-based policy: Adaptable policy for teachers and school leaders. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025955 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational Research Review, 22, 194-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.002 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  5. Černá, J., Kořínková, J., Kenning, J. & Vrbová, T. (2026). Quality of systematic reviews on teaching English as a non-native language: A systematic review protocol. Frontiers in Education (in press). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction - a framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe: Retrospective and prospective (pp. 13-37). Sense Publishers. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  7. Education Endowment Foundation. (2026). Teaching and Learning Toolkit. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/teaching-learning-toolkit
  8. Gorard, S. (2020). Getting evidence into education: Evaluating the routes to policy and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429290343 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  9. Hargreaves, D. H. (1997). In defence of research for evidence-based teaching: A rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 405-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192970230402 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  10. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  11. Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel: A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  12. Higgins, S., Kokotsaki, D., & Coe, R. (2011). Toolkit of strategies to improve learning: Summary for schools spending the pupil premium. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com/output/1633121
  13. Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., & Page, M. J. (Eds.). (2024). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane. https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook
  14. Jegstad, K. M. (2024). Inquiry-based chemistry education: A systematic review. Studies in Science Education, 60(2), 251-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2023.2248436 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. Kantor, J., Smrčková, A., Zaman, M., Belkin, L., Rozmarinová, J., Svobodová, Z., Sedláčková, D., & Klugarová, J. (2025). A qualitative systematic review protocol for a synthesis of teachers' and learners' experiences with the Teaching and Learning Toolkit. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1563052 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  16. Kantor, J., Sedláčková, D., Marečková, J., Svobodová, Z., Veselá, K., Smrčková, A., Barancová, K., Klugarová, J., & Klugar, M. (2023). Systematická review ve vzdělávání: typologie, standardizované metodiky a příklady jejich tvorby. EduPort, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.21062/edp.2023.005 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  17. Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., & Komorek, M. (1997). Das Modell der didaktischen Rekonstruktion. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 3(3), 3-18.
  18. Klugar, M. (2015). Systematická review ve zdravotnictví. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
  19. Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  20. Li, J. (2026). Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in inclusive education: A methodological review (Doctoral dissertation). Palacký University Olomouc.
  21. Mitchell, D. (2014). What really works in special and inclusive education. Routledge. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  22. Munn, Z., Stern, C., Aromataris, E., et al. (2018). What kind of systematic review should I conduct? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  23. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  24. Pellegrini, M., & Vivanet, G. (2020). Evidence-based policies in education: Initiatives and challenges in Europe. ECNU Review of Education, 4(1), 25-45. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  25. Petty, G. (2018). How to teach even better: An evidence-based approach. Oxford University Press.
  26. Schünemann, H. J., Brożek, J., Guyatt, G., & Oxman, A. (2013). GRADE handbook. https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html
  27. Soukup, P., Trahorsch, P., & Chytrý, V. (2021). Míry věcné významnosti s intervaly spolehlivosti a ukázky jejich využití v pedagogické praxi. Studia paedagogica, 26(3), 131-166. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  28. Svobodová, Z., & Kantor, J. (2024). Vyhledávání v informačních zdrojích se zaměřením na tvorbu systematických review v oblasti speciální pedagogiky. Štúdie zo špeciálnej pedagogiky, 13(2), 77-89.
  29. Thacker, B. (2023). Inquiry-based experimental physics: Twenty years of an evidence-based laboratory-based physics course. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020116 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  30. Tufanaru, C., Munn, Z., Aromataris, E., Campbell, J., & Hopp, L. (2024). Systematic reviews of effectiveness. In JBI manual for evidence synthesis. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-24-03 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  31. Vrbová, T., Kantor, J., Pavlisová, H., & Marečková, J. (2024). Implementační metodika JBI a její aplikace v pedagogické praxi. EduPort, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21062/edp.2024.005 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  32. White, H. (2020). Why we need a world education organisation. Campbell Collaboration. https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/blog/why-we-need-a-world-education-organisation.html

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.